5 Feb
2016
5 Feb
'16
11:44 a.m.
Dear John, On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 08:15:29PM +0000, John Curran wrote:
One of the concerns raised at a previous NANOG was with respect to the need for an RPKI relying parties to explicitly accept ARIN's relying party agreement (RPA) - note that this has now been changed (per the attached announcement)
Wile the RPA terms remain the same, it is no longer necessary to click-accept and provide an email in order to access ARIN's trust anchor locator (TAL).
Can you explain in layman terms what the legal consequences of this change are? Kind regards, Job