4 Sep
2015
4 Sep
'15
7:15 p.m.
hi valdis On 09/04/15 at 06:59pm, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
Does anybody have a citation that legal disclaimers attached to publicly posted mail aren't null and void? Seems to me that what they're trying to say is "Sorry, we're too lame to use PGP or similar on actually sensitive e-mail"...
i keep wondering why "they" keep using sniffable clear text smtp/imap/pop3 instead of at least encrypted version the problem also is both ends, the sender and the receiver and all the laptops/desktops need to be configured more importantly, why not just use https based webmail or even smpts encrypted google mail where less setup and configuring would be needed for sender and receiver have a nice weekend alvin # # DDoS-Mitigator.com #