-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- Dragos Ruiu <dr@kyx.net> wrote:
The question this presentation begs for me... is how many of the folks on this list do integrity checking on their routers?
You can no longer say this isn't necessary :-).
I know FX and a few others are working on toolsets for this...
I'll probably have other comments after I see the presentation. This development has all sort of implications for binary signing requirements, etc...
Yep -- I'd say just wait for the presentation (assuming Cisco doesn't go after this guy like they did Mike Lynn) and then determine the level of seriousness. It would appear to have people very nervous, however. Including Cisco. It will be interesting to see what develops. - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017) wj8DBQFILlgzq1pz9mNUZTMRAtmoAKC3bQLSqJzFDZklPMfdnkBX7fyccwCeN5mc K1QQ9JnTqLmSfcNuj5JZ6Z8= =W5F0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/