I have both Level3 and NTT v6 connections and there are no additional charges for the service. I recall NTT had one a few years ago, but I think that's fallen by the wayside. Mike -- Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksmith@adhost.com w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050 PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D) On 2/17/11 7:01 PM, "Jack Carrozzo" <jack@crepinc.com> wrote:
We pick up v6 from HE currently (like the rest of the world). L3 offered us dual stack also, but they wanted money to set it up plus MRC. None of our Bits That Matter (tm) go over v6 anyhow. (I guess the right phrase would be "revenue producing bits").
-Jack Carrozzo
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Eric Van Tol <eric@atlantech.net> wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Jared Mauch [mailto:jared@puck.nether.net] Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 2:49 PM To: Jack Carrozzo Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection
I'm curious what providers have not gotten their IPv6 plans/networks/customer ports enabled.
I know that Comcast is doing their trials now (Thanks John!) and will be presenting at the upcoming NANOG about their experiences.
What parts of the big "I" Internet are not enabled or ready?
We don't see Savvis, Level3, or AboveNet with IPv6 capabilities in our region (DC). Two years ago, neither Verizon or AT&T had IPv6, either. Not sure about them now, as we no longer use them for transit. One would think everyone would have v6 capabilities in the heart of government territory, but okay.
For whatever reason, Verio actually charges (or used to) for their IPv6 separately from IPv4 and to top it all off, it wasn't significantly discounted.
-evt