-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 09:09:59PM +0000, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, Geoffrey Pan wrote:
This space has been assigned to the same location, facility for years.
same location/facility doesn't mean that that place/people/thing still has authority to route the PA block... Like say the decided to stop having Cogent as a provider? or stopped payments to Cogent? or some other sort of snafu...
Cogent seems to think that they terminated a relationship with said company (one of what looks like many different hostway names at any rate), and gave them several months to renumber out of the IP allocation.
I'm guessing this has nothing to do with that fact that hostway/neucom in the past had a large number of IPs hosting adult contents for cogent's unwillingness to do this financial transaction?? Just curious. regards, /virendra -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE6o/LpbZvCIJx1bcRAi8JAKDIIIPHZm3Bne5iLEU95EaV831BSwCcDHFO Xb0a6rv7pOWAhCRE/QvAPV8= =7JKr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----