26 Jul
2010
26 Jul
'10
4:13 a.m.
Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi> writes:
RFC4193 + NAT quite simply is what they know and are comfortable with.
NAT is *not simple*. NAT adds one more layer of complexity. When using multiple NAT things get worse. In most cases people don't want or need NAT they are just used to it and old habits die hard. Jens -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Foelderichstr. 40 | 13595 Berlin, Germany | +49-151-18721264 | | http://blog.quux.de | jabber: jenslink@guug.de | ------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------