On 27 Nov 2019, at 11:40, Scott Weeks <surfer@mauigateway.com> wrote:
--- cb.list6@gmail.com wrote: From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
If your business is dysfunctional, that is a different issue from ipv6 being dysfunctional. -----------------------------------------
I was just expressing the problems eyeball networks are having getting this done. Shittons of stuff is out there in the CPE that mobile and DC networks do not have to deal with. The suits are looking at the short term cost/risk.
scott
Eyeball networks can still deliver IPv6 even if most of their gear isn’t IPv6 ready. 6rd [1] allows you to give every customer a /48 over a IPv4 access network. You just need to record the 6rd DHCPv4 Option being returned over time so you can map from IPv6 address to the IPv4 address your customer was using. You bill on the IPv4 packets. This is 10+ years old at this stage and quite frankly just works. Yes, you need a few BRs and a IPv6 path from them to the rest of the world. Lots of ISP’s deliver IPv6 to their customers today using 6rd. Lots of CPE routers support 6rd already and if the CPE router doesn’t there is no harm so no foul. If you are supplying CPE devices just replace ones that don’t support 6rd with ones that support 6rd (and native IPv6) as they break. If a customer requests a new CPE router post it to them. If you aren’t supplying CPE devices just tell your customers that 6rd is supported. 6rd works with 50 year replacement time frames. This is really no different to what HE has been doing for the last 20 years, it just moves the encapsulation / decapsulation closer to the customer. Mark [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5969 -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org