28 Feb
2015
28 Feb
'15
12:48 a.m.
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 8:32 AM, John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:
With the "legal content" rule, I expect some bottom feeding bulk mailers to sue claiming that their CAN SPAM compliant spam is legal, therefore the providers can't block it.
How would this legal environment be any different than the pre-Verizon network neutrality rules for network management of SPAM? -- *Collin David Anderson* averysmallbird.com | @cda | Washington, D.C.