On 6/10/15 2:46 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
That's fair enough, and some variability in what N is depending on device is as a well. But understanding whether what we're actually looking for is "static" or "single" is a pretty key piece of the requirements scoping, and it sounds like "static" is it, at least from your perspective. Is that a fair assessment?
Ted, I honestly can't tell if you're deliberately misrepresenting my argument, or if you're just being dense. You snipped the several places in my previous message where I stated what I think the best way forward is. But just in case it's the latter, not the former: "I think PD is the right answer here of course ..." "Meanwhile, DHCPv6 + PD solves all of Lorenzo's stated problems, but he won't implement it because "DHCP." That's not something you can engineer around." Doug -- I am conducting an experiment in the efficacy of PGP/MIME signatures. This message should be signed. If it is not, or the signature does not validate, please let me know how you received this message (direct, or to a list) and the mail software you use. Thanks!