Why? If we can coral them in it and legislate to have no porn anywhere else than on .xxx ... should fix the issue for the prudes out there. william(at)elan.net wrote:
http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-10may06.htm
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 08:46:40 -0400 From: David Farber <dave@farber.net> To: ip@v2.listbox.com Subject: [IP] ICANN rejects .xxx domain
Begin forwarded message:
As reported in:
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/print?id=1947950
ICANN has reversed their earlier preliminary approval, and has now rejected the "dot-xxx" adult materials top-level domain. I applaud this wise decision by ICANN, which should simultaneously please both anti-porn and free speech proponents, where opposition to the TLD has been intense, though for totally disparate reasons.
Nick's AP piece referenced above notes that there are still Congressional efforts to mandate such a TLD. It is important to work toward ensuring that these do not gain traction.
--Lauren-- Lauren Weinstein lauren@vortex.com or lauren@pfir.org Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 http://www.pfir.org/lauren Co-Founder, PFIR - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org Co-Founder, IOIC - International Open Internet Coalition - http://www.ioic.net Moderator, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com DayThink: http://daythink.vortex.com
-- Alain Hebert ahebert@pubnix.net PubNIX Inc. P.O. Box 175 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 5T7 tel 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net fax 514-990-9443