On 11/12/98, Mathias Koerber <mathias@staff.singnet.com.sg> wrote:
is it just me, or are people confused by the references to f.root-servers.net (Paul Vixie's machine) and f.gtld-servers.net
which was also reported to have problems? I only read "F server" in this article, but there are two of those, and only f.root-servers.net is operated by volunteers, f.gtld-servers.net is (AFAIK) operated by NSI...
Is it just me, or does it appear that this type of confusion could have easily been avoided, and NSI decided to not even attempt to avoid it? I'm usually the last person to run around spouting conspiracy theories about Network Solutions, but this is getting silly. -- J.D. Falk <jdfalk@cp.net> "A name indicates what we seek. Special Agent In Charge (Abuse Issues) An address indicates where it is. Critical Path, Inc. A route indicates how we get there." -- Jon Postel (1943-1998)