Re: clarity

I think the problem isn't with dirty water arriving from the water company, it's the fact that so many end users are allowing raw sewage to be poured into /other people's water/, and some ISPs don't feel compelled to do anything to save other ISPs from their users' pollutants.

I agree that an ISP should disconnect a user dumping raw sewage into the water system. However, that's a big difference from providing an end user a "clean internet" which is what the article proposed. To me, that means providing filtered internet services. That's a transit solution to an end-node problem. Disconnecting the abusing end-node(s) is an end-node solution. Owen -- If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.