Am I alone in my view that BGP is _far_ more simple and straight-forward than OSPF
that ospf has become exceedingly complex, and all that results thereof.
I couldn't agree more. Most of my staff are still under the impression in Cisco land that the "network 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0" statement injects that network into OSPF, when it simply turns on OSPF for the interfaces that are in that network. I'm really glad to see Cisco that made this change in OSPFv3 for v6. Clue On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
Am I alone in my view that BGP is _far_ more simple and straight-forward than OSPF
this is a very telling statement in a number of ways.
that ospf has become exceedingly complex, and all that results thereof.
that both are known for their complexity.
randy