At 10:29 2/26/99 -0800, Network Operations Center wrote:
We already have Admin, Tech, and Billing. Would it be possible to consider the addition of an Abuse contact in whois? Not actually a bad idea for (mail abuse) , But then the Tech Contact s/b able to remedy the condition by forwarding the info to postmaster , You have that defined for your domain don't you ?
By definition in the RFC's (remember those?) all email-related problems should go to the postmaster. Some ISPs have set up an abuse address specifically to handle spam problems; retaining the postmaster for more traditional problems. Unfortunately, we frequently find domains with a disabled or /dev/null-ed postermaster address. Adding an abuse address would accomplish nothing. If they don't have a working postmaster, it's not real likely they'd have a working abuse address either. "Small minds can only contemplate small ideas".....Unknown Dean Robb Owner, PC-EASY (757) 495-EASY [3279] On-site computer repair, upgrades and consultations Read my game reviews/columns in SimOps on WWW.TheGamers.Net