On 4/9/2014 5:11 PM, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 05:49:27PM -0400, Jeff Kell wrote:
The most "sane" out-of-mind response should only be sent *if* the out-of-mind person is named explicitly as a recipient in the RFC822 header. Anything To: somelist@somehost does not qualify :)
Jeff
and just how is an algorithm supposed to detect that <jeff-kell@utc.edu> is a single human and not a list?
It is really too bad that there is not place to put a "precedence" that the software could key on--with values like "bulk" or "junk" or "list". -- Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics of System Administrators: Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to learn from their mistakes. (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)