I'm surprised nobody noticed for close to 10 days.

Probably because it wasn't 10 days.  

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 10:26 PM Scott Q. <qmail@top-consulting.net> wrote:
I'm surprised nobody noticed for close to 10 days. I was away from work and upon coming back I saw the little discussion there was , in my Spam folder.

On Thursday, 16/05/2024 at 18:56 John R. Levine wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2024, William Herrin wrote:
> The message content (including the message headers) is theoretically
> not used for SPF validation. In practice, some SPF validators don't
> have direct access to the SMTP session so they rely on the SMTP
> session placing the envelope sender in the Return-path header.

But that wasn't the problem here, the SPF record was just gone.  Oops.

I see that the SPF record is back and seems have the correct addresses so
we can now return to our previously scheduled flamage.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly