That would only apply if there was malicious intent. ----- Original Message ----- From: <bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com> To: "Larry Diffey" <ldiffey@technologyforward.com> Cc: <nanog@merit.edu> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:57 PM Subject: Re: The wyrms and the law.
its worse than that.... :)
releasing buggy software that increases your systems vulnerability might fall within the boundary of "terrorist acts".
----- Original Message ----- From: "Roeland Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com> To: "NANOG (E-mail)" <nanog@merit.edu> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 11:04 AM Subject: The wyrms and the law.
Life just got more interesting for the crackers.
http://www.securityfocus.com/news/257
Yesterday a new virus was announced on the news. It's only an email
virus,
but in light of the above, the timing is interesting. The bar is being raised. Between Code Red and Nimda, the past few months have been most interesting, network-wise. By any stretch of the imagination, wyrm spawning falls well within the boundary of "terrorist acts".
The idea is that; to coerce behavior, via threat of harm or direct action to commit harm, is an act of terrorism. There goes the argument that crackers are doing us all a favor by exploiting security holes.
-- R O E L A N D M J M E Y E R Managing Director Morgan Hill Software Company tel: +1 925 373 3954 cel: +1 925 352 3615 fax: +1 925 373 9781 http://www.mhsc.com