Alex wrote:

There is actually a point here..

Randy Bush has continually been inconsistent in many aspects of this
business. The point is, that he wants us all to believe that we all have
no idea what we are doing, and he does.

I'd say as a 6 year subscriber of NANOG, if you don't like it,
unsubscribe.

I'm usually a quiet, passive and nice individual, but this is rediculous.

On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Peter Brown wrote:

> Another recipient of nanog annoyed by large threads,
> spurred on by stupid points that don't need to be made.

> Alex wrote:
>   Ehhh.....
> > And, who are you?
> >
> > On Mon, 13 Nov 2000, Peter Brown wrote:
> >
> > > If you were planning to fix every grammatical error on this list
> > > you better plan on having quite a lot of time on your hands.
> > >
> > > Alex Rubenstein wrote:
> > >
> > > > That would be 'affected', not 'effected.'
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > i am told
> > > > >   o the problem only effected your prefix, 199.245.173.0

-- 
Peter Brown
Internet Engineering
Advanced TelCom Group
707.284.5167