31 Mar
2003
31 Mar
'03
7:11 p.m.
Dan Hollis wrote:
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Jack Bates wrote:
On the other hand, an ISP that *is* aware of illegal activity would be negligent not to look into it.
How about the tier1's who route abuse@ to /dev/null? IMHO they are negligent and should be held liable...
I completely agree. Of course, they may be relying on the fact that they don't do anything outside of the scope of being a common carrier, so they shouldn't be held liable, despite the fact that they go against the agreed upon common good (i.e. abuse@ being manned). -Jack