* Thus spake David Schwartz (davids@webmaster.com): [snip]
The quesetion is bogus, there is no such thing as a right to have a route in my router without paying me for it. If I choose to extend that privilege to people who meet certain minimum requirements because I believe the benefits will outweight the costs, then that's *my* right. All others can pay me to do it if they want me to. Your rights end at my network.
DS
I agree that there is no 'right' to have a route in someone else's router. Different providers, different policies etc. etc. However, if I choose to filter on allocation boundaries but advertise prefixes to peers that I myself would filter based on my own policy is that considered hypocritical? Bad form? Acceptable? Just wondering aloud.