On Oct 14, 2020, at 3:34 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke@gmail.com> wrote:

I think he means packet captures from an example, voluntarily-tested recursive nameserver subject to this attack.

Thanks. We have updated all the report pages with a self-test tool specific to the network associated with the report. This should allow a network admin that received our report to check whether or not the condition still exists and to perform a packet capture from whatever vantage point they want in their network.

A more general tool (i.e., for anyone to use) will be made available in the future.

Cheers,

Casey

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 11:53 AM Casey Deccio <casey@deccio.net> wrote:
Hi Bryan,

> On Oct 14, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Bryan Holloway <bryan@shout.net> wrote:
>
> I too would like to know more about their methodology

We've written up our methodology and results in a paper that will be available in a few weeks. Happy to post it here if folks are interested. Obviously, no networks are individually identified; it's all aggregate.

Also, we're working on a self-test tool, but it's not quite ready yet. Sorry.

> and actual tangibles ideally in the form of PCAPs.

What do you mean by "tangibles in the form of PCAPs"?

Casey