6 Apr
2004
6 Apr
'04
5:35 a.m.
Michel Py wrote: Indeed; notice I did write "Bayesian-like" and not "Bayesian" and never mentioned anything about good ones or not-as-good ones.
Paul Jakma wrote: Right, but if we're going to talk about bayesian filtering in general, there's little sense in constraining the discussion to "not-as-good" bayesian filters. The not-as-good filters are obviously doomed to extinction, if they do not improve and become good ones.
Paul, I hope you forgive my bluntness, but this is the worst argument you have ever made in the hundreds of postings I had the privilege to exchange with you on other mailing lists over the years. Especially on _this_ mailing list, if you were right, Microsoft would be extinct. Michel.