7 Sep
2012
7 Sep
'12
2:23 a.m.
Oliver wrote:
All that necessary is local changes on end systems of those who want the end to end transparency.
There is no changes on the Internet.
You're basically redefining the term "end-to-end transparency" to suit your own
Already in RFC3102, which restrict port number ranges, it is stated that: This document examines the general framework of Realm Specific IP (RSIP). RSIP is intended as a alternative to NAT in which the end- to-end integrity of packets is maintained. We focus on implementation issues, deployment scenarios, and interaction with other layer-three protocols. It's you who tries to change the meaning of "end to end transparency". Masataka Ohta