"Richard" == Richard Cox <Richard@mandarin.com> writes:
Richard> On Mon, 05 Jan 2004 07:40:38 +0800 someone claiming to be Richard> "Richard Cocks" <investigator@hellokitty.com> wrote: Richard> {snip} Richard> For the record, neither that post, nor the earlier post Richard> which asserted a Sender name of "Hijacked-L" were from, Richard> or in any way authorised by me. Richard, The account investigator@hellokitty.com has been terminated for a violation of our AUP. Richard> nycmny1-ar7-4-46-056-062.nycmny1.elnk.dsl.genuity.net Richard> [4.46.56.62] dnsbl.njabl.org : BLOCKED Richard> [4.46.56.62] dnsbl.sorbs.net : BLOCKED That's just because it is a dynamic IP. A previous post (the hijacked-l one I think) came from a roadrunner DSL line, also in new york. Might be interesting to find out which nanog poster 1. Lives in or around New York 2. Is interested in suppressing hijacked netblocks [both of which are really excellent things, in themselves] ... and ... 3. Is willing to forge another nanog poster's name in an attempt to stay anonymous, or maybe get around filters / nanog moderators etc. srs -- srs (postmaster|suresh)@outblaze.com // gpg : EDEDEFB9 manager, outblaze.com security and antispam operations