22 Dec
2014
22 Dec
'14
10:59 a.m.
On 22/12/2014 14:50, Niels Bakker wrote:
As long as they don't count it for their total connected parties statistics, I'm good with it being included in the list, to help people find missing or since-disconnected peers at the IXP in an automated fashion.
it is inappropriate to include it in the number of connected parties, but there's no problem including the IXP ASN in the list of connected parties so long as it's made clear that they're not standard IXP participants. Nick