Not to stir the pot, but Extreme is making some good products at a low cost and have lifetime warranties. I've been using them lately in the end-user edge as lower cost POE termination. They do LLDP-MED flawlessly so Cisco, or other phones get their voice vlan and pass the data vlan. Now, they are missing some of the prime-time features found in J and C which is why I wouldn't recommend them in the agg or core. -b On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Tom <bifrost@minions.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, James Smith wrote:
So my questions to the NANOG community are: Would you recommend HP over Cisco or Juniper?
Pretty much never, unless you're talking about a rebadged Brocade product. Every time I've seen HP networking gear in production, its usually before it gets replaced with something else. The last install I dealt with was having so many problems it had a constant %10 packetloss on a simple flat network.
How is HP's functionality and performance compared to Cisco or Juniper?
Typically poor, but this varies widely with the series of HP gear. The software updates available also vary widely in quality, and I have rarely gotten a good answer from HP support on anything.
Does anyone have any HP networking experiences they can share, good or bad?
To end on a positive note, HP does have a good warranty, is typically fairly low cost and provides free software updates.
-Tom
-- Bill Blackford Network Engineer Logged into reality and abusing my sudo privileges.....