On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 10:05:43PM -0500, Steve Bertrand wrote:
On 2010.03.04 20:55, Owen DeLong wrote:
I proffer that such effort is better spent moving towards IPv6 dual stack on your networks.
I *wholeheartedly* agree with Owen's assessment. Even spending time trying to calculate a rebuttal to his numbers is better spent moving toward dual-stack ;)
Nice.
Steve
er... what part of dual-stack didn't you understand? dual-stack consumes exactly the same number of v4 and v6 addresses. if you expect to dual-stack everything - you need to look again. either you are going to need: lots more IPv4 space stealing ports to mux addresses run straight-up native IPv6 - no IPv4 (unless you need to talk to a v4-only host - then use IVI or similar..) imho - the path through the woods is an IVI-like solution. --bill