20 Dec
2004
20 Dec
'04
12:42 p.m.
Hank Nussbacher wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/12/18/spam.lawsuit.ap/index.html
What a nice present for the holiday season :-)
-Hank
Indeed! If it will hold after the appeal. Thing is, the spammers are not there to be found for paying, so they might not exist for appealing. Meaning this might become a real legal precedence.. so maybe there will even be a second. Gadi.