On 10/6/10 10:34 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Oct 6, 2010, at 6:35 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 7/10/10 12:08 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
so ... should domains associated with asn(s) and addr block allocations be subject to some expiry policy other than "it goes into the drop pool and one of {enom,pool,...} acquire it (and the associated non-traffic assets) for any interested party at $50 per /24"?
Interesting idea, but how do you apply it to ccTLD domains with widely varying policies. All it takes is whois records being legitimately updated to use domain contacts using a ccTLD domain to circumvent. Sounds like more of a stop-gap measure.
Regards, Ben
Number resources are not and should not be associated with domain resources at the policy level. This would make absolutely no sense whatsoever.
hmm. ... "are not" ... so the event complained of ... didn't happen?