Nothing says a better Internet than one the government pokes their nose around in. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "William Herrin" <bill@herrin.us> To: "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog@nanog.org> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 5:25:47 PM Subject: Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
folk can rant on nanog all they want if it makes them feel good or self-righteous.
Hi Randy, It DOES make me feel good. And a little self-righteous.
won't change a damned thing.
Some FCC employees read this forum. My impression is that they're not terribly far from concluding that closed peering policies are anti-competitive. When I have such impressions I'm usually off by years. Still, it would be nice if just once an industry cleaned itself up -before- regulators forced the issue. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>