12 Jan
2010
12 Jan
'10
1:59 p.m.
On Jan 12, 2010, at 1:48 PM, Dave Martin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:51:47AM -0500, Jed Smith wrote:
On Jan 11, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Jon Lewis wrote: The vibe I got from a number of administrators I talked to about it was "why would a standards document assume an IPv4/IPv6 unicast address is a residential customer with a modem, forcing those with allocations to prove that they are not residentially allocated rather than the other way around?"
Because a default allow policy doesn't work in today's environment.
Blocking based on PTR alone is dangerous, is what I'm saying. I know default deny is important, but the decision can only be minorly influenced by PTR, not entirely made on it. There needs to be a better way, but there isn't. JS