Re: Court orders for blocking of streaming services

John Levine wrote:

I agree that the rest of the language demanding that every ISP, hosting provider, credit union, bank, and presumably nail salon and coin laundry in the US stop serving the defendants is nuts.

As the order is to those "having actual knowledge of this Default Judgment and Permanent Injunction Order", according to DMCA, that should be a reasonable order for hosting providers of illegal contents but not for transit ISPs. In addition, it seems to me that name server operators "having actual knowledge" that some domain names are used for copyright infringements are not be protected by DMCA. Masataka Ohta