Leo Vegoda wrote:
On 19 Dec 2007, at 21:31, Jeroen Massar wrote:
[...]
When an ISP is not going to provide /48's to endusers then RIPE NCC should revoke the IPv6 prefix they received as they are not following the reasons why they received the prefix for.
They received the prefix because they had a plan. That's all, a plan. Not a promise.
It is not a plan, it is justification. The 200-rule has been taken out of the allocation already. And based on the x customers times /48, they justified that they will need a /20 or something else. As such when they are going to give out /56's, they suddenly need 256 times as many customers and unless they are going to grow insanely (for a /32 from ~60k to 15m customers) they won't be able to justify their address space anymore. As such, keep it simple folks, just pass out /48's. Greets, Jeroen