![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/417b5c0a10d74a7d3dc065cae9aeda3d.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On April 13, 2008 at 15:17 szlists@szarka.org (Rob Szarka) wrote:
At 02:18 PM 4/13/2008, Barry Shein wrote:
Is it abuse@domain or spam@domain or support@domain or postmaster@domain (very commonly used) or ???@domain. Who cares? But let's pick ONE, stuff it in an RFC or BCP and try to get each other to conform to it.
abuse@domain is *already* specified (in RFC 2142).
Thank you. Perhaps that's why I prefaced that paragraph with: Oh yeah here's another (ok maybe somewhere this is written down), how ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ about agreeing on contact mailboxes like we did with postmaster@domain? but you for some reason elided it. Well, difficult to resist quibbling an example I suppose. -- -Barry Shein The World | bzs@TheWorld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD | Login: Nationwide Software Tool & Die | Public Access Internet | SINCE 1989 *oo*