27 Nov
2021
27 Nov
'21
10:07 a.m.
Mark Tinka wrote:
I can very easily see why "IPv6 saves you on CG-NAT capex might not be entirely true" in cases such as these.
Because lengthy IPv6 addresses mean a lot more opex than IPv4.
On paper, it all adds up.
With IPv6, you need 4 times more paper. Masataka Ohta