On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com> wrote:
On 11 Feb 2011, at 04:51, Ricky Beam wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:31:21 -0500, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:
Amusingly enough, I personally (along with others) made arguments along these lines back in 1995 or so when the IAB was coming out with http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1814.txt. Given the publication of 1814, you can probably guess how far those arguments fared.
You missed the "anticipates external connectivity to the Internet" part. Networks that never touch the internet have RFC1918 address space to use. (and that works 99.999% of the time.)
Except in acquisitions and private peering.
as
Especially during acquisitions, my $EMPLOYEER has made several acquisitions recently and every one of them was wrought with painful RFC1918 overlap problems. Thanks, Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juicewvu@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c)