well, apropos to point #2, the iso3166/ma includes representatives from ten agencies, of which a certain 501(c)(3) originally in marina del rey, now in los angeles, is included. however, i can't imagine staff offering an opinion of record on the subject. "ay" for "aye" would work for me. -e On 9/17/14 8:03 AM, manning bill wrote:
Perhaps a dose of factual information may temper this thread. If we are talking about ISO-3166-2 - the basis for the CCTLD delegations, then:
1_ Scotland has no say in the country code selected. 2_ ICANN has no say in the country code selected. 3_ The choice is up to an ISO committee.
See: http://www.iso.org/iso/country_codes.htm
/bill PO Box 12317 Marina del Rey, CA 90295 310.322.8102
On 16September2014Tuesday, at 18:15, Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon@cox.net> wrote:
On 9/16/2014 18:57, Masataka Ohta wrote:
What will happen to ".uk" if England is left alone?
Masataka Ohta There are still at least 3 countries left in the UK if Scotland splits.
The name change is that in that event, Great Britain (.gb country-code Reserved Domain - IANA) will refer only to the land mass (which it should any way, but if often used to refer to the three kingdoms on it.
-- The unique Characteristics of System Administrators:
The fact that they are infallible; and,
The fact that they learn from their mistakes.