Hi Tom, Good question. The End-user IPv6 prefix can be constructed using whatever techniques independent of MAP etc. in any deployment requiring IPv4 address sharing. What is interesting is that the MAP enabled CPE could parse certain bits of that IPv6 prefix to mean something for MAP. That's it. Attached is a screenshot to illustrate this very point. Cheers, Rajiv -----Original Message----- From: Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> Date: Monday, April 8, 2013 3:48 PM To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: Re: Verizon DSL moving to CGN
In what sense do you mean that? The end-user IPv6 prefix certainly ties IPv4 and IPv6 together, hence the interest in the Light-Weight IPv4 over IPv6 alternative.
Tom
On 08/04/2013 3:13 PM, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) wrote:
Chris,
UmmmŠ you mean the IPv6 and IPv4 inter-dependency when you say IP encumbered?
If so, the answer is Yes. v6 addressing doesn't need to change to accommodate this IPv4 A+P encoding.
Cheers, Rajiv
...
