2 Nov
2005
2 Nov
'05
7:03 p.m.
actually, no, I could compare a /48 to a class A. On Nov 2, 2005, at 3:51 PM, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
er.. would this be a poor characterization of the IPv6 addressing architecture which is encouraged by the IETF and the various RIR members?
class A == /32 class B == /48 class C == /56 hostroute == /64
(and just think of all that spam than can originate from all those "loose" IP addresses in that /64 for your local SMTP server!!! Yummy)
-- Oat Willie
-------------------------------------------------------------- "Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia." (Charles Schulz )