29 Oct
2003
29 Oct
'03
9:06 a.m.
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 01:17:26PM -0800, william@elan.net wrote:
Does anybody honestly think companies will commit the capex needed to implement IPv6? Not without additional benefits. We need either applications that are working a lot better at ipv6 or we may yet have to see ipv4 space ran out before it becomes clear to everybody that ipv6 is a must.
imagine a network without NAT. I stopped counting applications that are struggling/breaking with NAT... But many people still believe rfc1918 and NAT are a cool thing because they just got used to it... tschuess Stefan -- Stefan Mink, Schlund+Partner AG (AS 8560) Primary key fingerprint: 389E 5DC9 751F A6EB B974 DC3F 7A1B CF62 F0D4 D2BA