On 4/17/24 23: 24, Aaron Gould wrote: > Well JTAC just said that it seems ok, and that 400g is going to show > 4x more than 100g "This is due to having to synchronize much more to > support higher data. " > We've seen the same between
On 4/17/24 23:24, Aaron Gould wrote:
> Well JTAC just said that it seems ok, and that 400g is going to show
> 4x more than 100g "This is due to having to synchronize much more to
> support higher data."
>
We've seen the same between Juniper and Arista boxes in the same rack
running at 100G, despite cleaning fibres, swapping optics, moving ports,
moving line cards, e.t.c. TAC said it's a non-issue, and to be expected,
and shared the same KB's.
It's a bit disconcerting when you plot the data on your NMS, but it's
not material.
Mark.