I would be happy if it was Juniper or Cisco ish. Right now it's just total crap :) From: brandon.j.kim@live.com [mailto:brandon.j.kim@live.com] On Behalf Of Brandon Kim Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:14 AM To: leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com; Blake Pfankuch; jay@miscreant.org; jra@baylink.com Cc: nanog group Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow Never messed around with Juniper....
From: leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com<mailto:leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com> To: brandon.kim@brandontek.com<mailto:brandon.kim@brandontek.com>; blake@pfankuch.me<mailto:blake@pfankuch.me>; jay@miscreant.org<mailto:jay@miscreant.org>; jra@baylink.com<mailto:jra@baylink.com> CC: nanog@nanog.org<mailto:nanog@nanog.org> Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:53:43 +0000
-----Original Message----- From: Brandon Kim [mailto:brandon.kim@brandontek.com]<mailto:[mailto:brandon.kim@brandontek.com]> Sent: 14 February 2012 15:51 To: blake@pfankuch.me<mailto:blake@pfankuch.me>; jay@miscreant.org<mailto:jay@miscreant.org>; jra@baylink.com<mailto:jra@baylink.com> Cc: nanog group Subject: RE: Sonicwall 3500/netflow
I've been using 5.8 with no problems thus far. As for the CLI, yes it is CLUNKY.
But they are completely revamping it, it will be very similar to Cisco in the near future...
Why do people like to base their CLIs on the really rather awful Cisco style interface rather than something with some more structure like Juniper?
-- Leigh Porter
______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com ______________________________________________________________________