Mike brings up a good point though; the effort, cost, and risk of introducing a new CLI to an environment sometimes is masked until you really need to dig in and work through outages. Familiarity with a codebase or at least with how the code "thinks" should go a long way when deciding what to put in your racks. Of course, how do you quantify that? On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Mike Hale <eyeronic.design@gmail.com>wrote:
I'm exact opposite of Phil. I love IOS and hate JunOS....for that single reason, I'm really against buying Juniper in our shop for pretty much anything. :)
Still, to be fair, the hardware seems to be really, really stable and well built. I don't think we've had a failure across our Junipers in the short time I've been with my day job.
As far as support goes...the only time we had issues with our Nexus gear I was actually really, really disappointed with Cisco. We were upgrading our firmware, ran into some major issues with VPC and HSRP due some firmware changes, and the Tac engineer we got sucked *massive* lemons. When I call Tac with a situation like this, I expect someone who can code a working config from scratch based on the old config, not someone who's going to sit there scratching his head, running useless packet captures, and being silent when we ask questions. *sigh*
/rant off
I've had nothing but good luck with Juniper support and well with Cisco you pay for support too. I will say Arista support was great, however, I'm still hesitant to put them in full production; but I think that is lack of experience with them speaking.
Do the bake off in your lab and let'm run!
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Blake Pfankuch - Mailing List < blake.mailinglist@pfankuch.me> wrote:
Let me also clarify, Price per port is not the final deciding factor. We are looking much more at a combination of daily operational sanity, troubleshooting features, operational feature set, vendor support quality and price.****
** **
Support is absolute key. When we need help, we need help quickly and knowledgeable support. The name checkpoint comes to mind when I think of something I DON’T want for support quality. It also causes nausea…****
** **
Thanks,****
** **
Blake****
** **
*From:* Phil Fagan [mailto:philfagan@gmail.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, June 18, 2013 6:08 PM *To:* Blake Pfankuch - Mailing List *Cc:* NANOG (nanog@nanog.org) *Subject:* Re: Network Vendor suggestions/reviews, Arista Networks, Dell Force10, Juniper, Extreme Networks etc...****
** **
I love JUNOS, don't really care for IOS. I really trust Cisco and Juniper's hardware, with that being said Arista is your best bet for cheapest port. I've only seen Arista in lab, not in the wild yet so I can't speak for how I would trust them. You mention getting bit by single sups, I believe as of late Arista has had issue with OSPF failover time between dual-sups in HA setups.****
** **
I used to have a Dell laptop....but I'm sure their great too. In the end for me I only trust Cisco or Juniper. I've been burnt by Foundry and am waiting to on Arista. ****
** **
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Blake Pfankuch - Mailing List < blake.mailinglist@pfankuch.me> wrote:****
Howdy, I have been working on a proposal for the organization I work for to move into the 10gbit datacenter. We have a small datacenter currently of about 1000 ports of 1gbit. We have traditionally been a full Cisco shop, however I was asked to do a price comparison as well as features with other major alternative vendors. I was also asked to do some digging as far as what "the real world" thinks about these possible vendors.
We currently have 2 Cisco 6509's with 8 48 port cards Sup 3BXL, 2 Cisco 4506 with 5x 48 port card and Sup V's and 2 4900M switches providing 10gbit to a very specialized implementation. With all of our technology, we
to not be bleeding edge, but oozing edge. We need 5 9's or more of uptime yearly so stability is preferable to cool features. We currently have single supervisors in all of our switches (not my decision) and it has bit us recently. Everything we are looking at needs to support NSF/SSO/VSS of some kind.
What we have been looking to replace it with in Cisco world is Nexus 7004 Core and Nexus 5596UP with 2200 series Fabric extenders for Dist/Access as well as 2200 Fabric Extenders within our Dell Blade Chassis. Realistically we will be under 800 ports of 10gbit (excluding Blades) which puts us in a tough spot from what I can find. Currently everything we have is EOR, however TOR would make more sense allowing us to switch to SFP+ twinax connectivity to servers.
With this in mind, I have a few questions...
It was mandated that I look at a company "Arista Networks" and investigate possible options. I had not heard much about them, so I look to the experts. Pro's and Con's? Real world experience? Looks to me they have a lot of cool features, but I'm slightly concerned with how new they might be, how reliable it would be as well as their QA/bugfix history. Also 24x4 support and hardware replacement. Everything in our datacenter currently has a 2 or 4 hour cisco contract on it and critical core components have a cold spare in inventory.
Dell Force 10... I know Dell tries to get you to drink the Koolaid on
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Phil Fagan <philfagan@gmail.com> wrote: try this
solution, I was a former Dell Partner and they even pushed me to get demo equipment going... What's the experience with their chassis switches? Stability? Configuration sanity? What do people like? What do people hate?
Juniper. What do people like? What do people hate? Have the Layer 2 issues of historical age gone away? Is the config still xml ish? It has been about 5 years since I worked with anything Juniper.
Extreme networks. I know very little about them historically. What is good, what is bad? Is the config sane?
I would be happy to compile any information I find, as well as our sanitized internal conclusions. On and off list responses welcome.
If there is another vendor anyone would suggest, please add them to the list with similarly asked questions.
Thanks!
Blake****
****
** **
-- ****
Phil Fagan****
Denver, CO****
970-480-7618****
-- Phil Fagan Denver, CO 970-480-7618
-- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
-- Phil Fagan Denver, CO 970-480-7618