25 Jan
1999
25 Jan
'99
11:30 a.m.
do i want to find out if ciscos and junipers can handle a hundred+ secondary addresses?
i'd guess neither vendor would have problems with this. however, several routing protocols have problems with secondary addresses. while BGP does not, folks are likely doing other "interesting" things at exchanges that this would effect. not to mention administrative overhead with adding new secondary address and such when adding additional peers.
and do we want to maintain such configurations??
not particularly. i'd think for the price of local loop, co-location and port fees, they'd be able to pick up the tab for the subnet... yet another reason to avoid public exchanges altogether, i suppose. -danny