On Feb 11, 2013, at 18:52 , "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net> wrote:
On Feb 11, 2013, at 14:11 , Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> wrote:
Multicast _is_ useful for filling the millions of DVRs out there with broadcast programs and for live events (eg. sports). A smart VOD system would have my DVR download the entire program from a local cache--and then play it locally as with anything else I watch. Those caches could be populated by multicast as well, at least for popular content. The long tail would still require some level of unicast distribution, but that is _by definition_ a tiny fraction of total demand.
One of us has a different dictionary than everyone else.
Assume I have 10 million movies in my library, and 10 million active users. Further assume there are 10 movies being watched by 100K users each, and 9,999,990 movies which are being watched by 1 user each.
Obvious typo, supposed to be 8,999,990. Or you can say I have 11 million users. Whichever floats your boat. Hopefully the point is still clear, even in a crowd as pedantic as this. -- TTFN, patrick
Which has more total demand, the 10 popular movies or the long tail?
This doesn't mean Netflix or Hulu or iTunes or whatever has the aforementioned demand curve. But it does mean my "definition" & yours do not match.
Either way, I challenge you to prove the long tail on one of the serious streaming services is a "tiny fraction" of total demand.
-- TTFN, patrick