26 Nov
2012
26 Nov
'12
1:54 p.m.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Dobbins, Roland <rdobbins@arbor.net> wrote:
On Nov 26, 2012, at 10:36 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
Ipv6 is not important for users, it is important for network operators
who want to sustain their business.
I agree with the first part; not sure I agree with the second part.
Nope. Nobody will leave money on the table by alienating users.
I think it may be possible to make money with compelling IPv6-only
content/services/applications.
I disagree, i simply see an additional fee for IPv4 coming about.
+1 And that in itself seems like it would make IPv6-reachable things a lot more compelling.