-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Tuesday, January 14, 2003 13:00:38 +0100 Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
I had great respect for Axelsson before this incident, after seeing his behaviour more up close I nowadays loathe him for his methods.
Let's put it this way:
Nobody is an angel in this mess, definately not Axelsson.
I agree. What Björn Fries did (using public resources) was sort of going over the line. What the ISP's did (or did not) does smell somewhat. And the most kind thing one can say about Axelsson is that his "free speech" content has a heavy list towards "sensational" topics, such as: * porn * illegal drugs * illegal manufacture of alcohol * publicising intimate details about criminals and famous people. * lock-picking to name but a few. A tabloid newspaper of the worst kind would be wary of printing this, even if it is in the general direction of their vulture habits. Today this is the content of the spam we all try to discard asap... And I am very well aware of the fact that "free speech" is in theory something binary -- you either have it or not. If we want to have free speech we'll have to tolerate this kind of content. Somewhere. So, last post on this. - -- Måns Nilsson Systems Specialist +46 70 681 7204 KTHNOC MN1334-RIPE We're sysadmins. To us, data is a protocol-overhead. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (OpenBSD) iD8DBQE+Kpb902/pMZDM1cURAjhPAJ9x2DjMcGs6K0HyzLOd7KmIuzmalQCdGGZF UIoiDNek8V2sKBs3LoHpDYU= =Bhsb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----