27 Oct
2019
27 Oct
'19
4:11 p.m.
On 27. Oct 2019, at 20:36, Joe Maimon <jmaimon@jmaimon.com> wrote:
Not quite.
203.0.113.1 203.0.113.3 203.0.113.5 203.0.112.6 203.0.112.7
Will aggregate to 203.0.113.0/29 if you dont mind the missing 3 addresses in the unaggregated list.
Hence, fuzzy aggregation.
Could you describe the problem again? I’m interested, but I’m not sure that I quite understand what you want to do :-) were the last two addresses supposed to have 112 in the third octet? Nick