On Aug 22, 2012, at 14:53 , Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com> wrote:
From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi.com@nanog.org Wed Aug 22 14:55:41 2012 From: Larry Smith <lesmith@ecsis.net> To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Copyright infringement notice Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 14:55:13 -0500
On Wed August 22 2012 14:07, Robert Bonomi wrote:
I'm NOT SURE whether the ISP has any potential liability in _this_ situation -- there's nothing 'published' by their customer for them to 'take down', etc.
Actually, I believe in most cases the only way "they" (DMCA)
There is no 'they' that is the DMCA -- it is simply a piece of legislation. That said, there is nothing the OP said to indicate that what he received _was_ a DMCA 'takedown notice'. although a follow-up did *assume* that that was what the OP received.
Yes... In this case, "they" would be the DMCA authors -- the RIAA and the MPAA. (which is what I suspect Mr. Smith actually meant). Owen