Also, if you think I am too liberal or a democrat I am not. In fact I am an Independant voter, and I am actually rather conservative about government. I just think this is one place where they could do good. In the end I think they will step in anyhow. After all, are ISPs so different than long-distance phone companies who lease lines from RBOCs, connect residential and business consumers, and take data interstate? Sound familiar to anyone? If you think the FCC isn't going to do something to regulate ISPs.. think again.. they could get the mandate far easier than you would like to belive.
government regulation would do exactly what it has done for radio and tv. it would be almost impossible for startups to play, even if you maintain a minimum level of service, simply because it is too expensive. it would drive out small players who may have a lot of good to contribute. also, there is no way to tell the government how much regulation they are allowed. if they decide they want to come in and violate constitutional rights left and right (government controlled encryption for american citizens on the government controlled internet, anyone?) then there is little that can be done to stop them. you can't defend yourself against the vampire once you have invited him across your doorstep. so perhaps that is the trade-off. high-probability of network stability vs. freedom. personally, i think government intervention would only serve to stunt on-line activity, but the big 3 are looking at the bottom line and i am sure see a different picture. b3n